Charity profile · Historical source record

United Way of Greater Los Angeles

Historical collection: May 2019 · Rating details mostly from 2017. Source & context

The mission

What this organization describes

Live united
United Way of Greater Los Angeles fights poverty and improves the quality of life for all in Los Angeles County by meeting basic needs like housing and health care, improving the educational achievement of youth, and helping families become financially stable. We provide expert research on the issues, invest in direct service programs that produce results, focus on systems change and drive change through partnerships that bring about effective and stronger solutions. By focusing our efforts on local and state public policy, we treat many of the root causes of poverty through desperately needed systems-change.

Mission and tagline reproduced from the source record.

Historical scorecard

Three perspectives. One record.

89.50Overall score
out of 100
85.70Financial score
out of 100
96.00Accountability & transparency
out of 100

These are the dataset’s historical numeric fields, not a current rating or a new DonorAPI.com assessment. Read the score context ↗

Financial context

Revenue, expenses, and composition

Total revenue · USD$67,005,092
Total expenses · USD$67,760,243

Program expenses

$58,002,768.01 recorded amount
85.6%

Fundraising expenses

$7,182,585.76 recorded amount
10.6%

Administrative expenses

$2,507,128.99 recorded amount
3.7%
Fundraising efficiency
$0.10 spent per $1 raised in donations, as defined in the source.

Expense shares are displayed as percentages. Component amounts in this collection match total expenses multiplied by the source ratios; rounding can leave a small difference from the total. The source does not supply a row-specific fiscal year. Field definitions ↗

Historical leadership record

The leadership information supplied

Recorded leader
Elise Buik
Recorded compensation
$407,050.00
Recorded compensation percentage
0.60%

These fields do not establish the current officeholder or current compensation. The metadata does not specify the denominator of the leader compensation percentage. Read with context ↗

Inspect all 23 original source fields

Exact source strings are retained below, including numeric precision. A blank value is marked as not reported; zero remains zero.

All 23 original fields for United Way of Greater Los Angeles
Source fieldOriginal source value
ascore
Accountability & transparency score
96.0
category
Category
Community Development
description
Mission & description
United Way of Greater Los Angeles fights poverty and improves the quality of life for all in Los Angeles County by meeting basic needs like housing and health care, improving the educational achievement of youth, and helping families become financially stable. We provide expert research on the issues, invest in direct service programs that produce results, focus on systems change and drive change through partnerships that bring about effective and stronger solutions. By focusing our efforts on local and state public policy, we treat many of the root causes of poverty through desperately needed systems-change.
ein
EIN
95-2274801
tot_exp
Total expenses
67760243.0
admin_exp_p
Administrative expense fraction
0.037000000000000005
fund_eff
Fundraising efficiency ($ per $1 raised)
0.1
fund_exp_p
Fundraising expense fraction
0.106
program_exp_p
Program expense fraction
0.856
fscore
Financial score
85.7
leader
Recorded leader
Elise Buik
leader_comp
Recorded leader compensation
407050.0
leader_comp_p
Recorded leader compensation fraction
0.006
motto
Tagline
Live united
name
Charity name
United Way of Greater Los Angeles
tot_rev
Total revenue
67005092.0
score
Overall score
89.5
state
State code
CA
subcategory
Subcategory
United Ways
size
Source size label
big
program_exp
Program expenses
58002768.008
fund_exp
Fundraising expenses
7182585.757999999
admin_exp
Administrative expenses
2507128.9910000004

Source: Charity Navigator Scores Expenses Dataset, version 1, attributed to katyjqian on Kaggle. Collection: May 2019; rating details mostly from 2017. Read attribution, scope, and reuse notes.