Charity profile · Historical source record

Greater Phoenix Economic Council

Historical collection: May 2019 · Rating details mostly from 2017. Source & context

The mission

What this organization describes

Improving Phoenix's competitiveness
The Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) is one of the region's premier economic development groups. GPEC has been working on behalf of businesses looking to relocate and expand -- at absolutely no cost to the company -- for nearly 25 years. We are a public-private partnership representing Maricopa County, 22 communities throughout the region and more than 160 private investors. Our mission is to attract quality businesses to the Greater Phoenix region from around the world, and to advocate and champion foundational efforts to improve the region's competitiveness.

Mission and tagline reproduced from the source record.

Historical scorecard

Three perspectives. One record.

86.33Overall score
out of 100
84.11Financial score
out of 100
89.00Accountability & transparency
out of 100

These are the dataset’s historical numeric fields, not a current rating or a new DonorAPI.com assessment. Read the score context ↗

Financial context

Revenue, expenses, and composition

Total revenue · USD$6,047,343
Total expenses · USD$4,949,973

Program expenses

$4,054,027.89 recorded amount
81.9%

Fundraising expenses

$232,648.73 recorded amount
4.7%

Administrative expenses

$658,346.41 recorded amount
13.3%
Fundraising efficiency
$0.04 spent per $1 raised in donations, as defined in the source.

Expense shares are displayed as percentages. Component amounts in this collection match total expenses multiplied by the source ratios; rounding can leave a small difference from the total. The source does not supply a row-specific fiscal year. Field definitions ↗

Historical leadership record

The leadership information supplied

Recorded leader
Chris Camacho
Recorded compensation
$377,791.00
Recorded compensation percentage
7.63%

These fields do not establish the current officeholder or current compensation. The metadata does not specify the denominator of the leader compensation percentage. Read with context ↗

Inspect all 23 original source fields

Exact source strings are retained below, including numeric precision. A blank value is marked as not reported; zero remains zero.

All 23 original fields for Greater Phoenix Economic Council
Source fieldOriginal source value
ascore
Accountability & transparency score
89.0
category
Category
Community Development
description
Mission & description
The Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) is one of the region's premier economic development groups. GPEC has been working on behalf of businesses looking to relocate and expand -- at absolutely no cost to the company -- for nearly 25 years. We are a public-private partnership representing Maricopa County, 22 communities throughout the region and more than 160 private investors. Our mission is to attract quality businesses to the Greater Phoenix region from around the world, and to advocate and champion foundational efforts to improve the region's competitiveness.
ein
EIN
86-0539979
tot_exp
Total expenses
4949973.0
admin_exp_p
Administrative expense fraction
0.133
fund_eff
Fundraising efficiency ($ per $1 raised)
0.04
fund_exp_p
Fundraising expense fraction
0.047
program_exp_p
Program expense fraction
0.8190000000000001
fscore
Financial score
84.11
leader
Recorded leader
Chris Camacho
leader_comp
Recorded leader compensation
377791.0
leader_comp_p
Recorded leader compensation fraction
0.07629999999999999
motto
Tagline
Improving Phoenix's competitiveness
name
Charity name
Greater Phoenix Economic Council
tot_rev
Total revenue
6047343.0
score
Overall score
86.33
state
State code
AZ
subcategory
Subcategory
Housing and Neighborhood Development
size
Source size label
mid
program_exp
Program expenses
4054027.887
fund_exp
Fundraising expenses
232648.731
admin_exp
Administrative expenses
658346.409

Source: Charity Navigator Scores Expenses Dataset, version 1, attributed to katyjqian on Kaggle. Collection: May 2019; rating details mostly from 2017. Read attribution, scope, and reuse notes.