Charity profile · Historical source record

Longmont Humane Society

Historical collection: May 2019 · Rating details mostly from 2017. Source & context

The mission

What this organization describes

Caring, serving and educating to improve the lives of companion animals.
In 1972, the Longmont Branch of the Boulder County Humane Society officially became the Longmont Humane Society. The Longmont Humane Society is an open admission facility with a mission of: Caring, serving and educating to improve the lives of companion animals. LHS provides temporary shelter to thousands of animals every year: dogs, cats, small mammals, and birds who are lost, abandoned, or surrendered. Loving attention, nutritious food, meticulous health care and daily exercise are standard parts of the high-quality care provided to each animal.

Mission and tagline reproduced from the source record.

Historical scorecard

Three perspectives. One record.

83.19Overall score
out of 100
76.23Financial score
out of 100
100.00Accountability & transparency
out of 100

These are the dataset’s historical numeric fields, not a current rating or a new DonorAPI.com assessment. Read the score context ↗

Financial context

Revenue, expenses, and composition

Total revenue · USD$3,751,406
Total expenses · USD$3,777,711

Program expenses

$2,583,954.32 recorded amount
68.4%

Fundraising expenses

$506,213.27 recorded amount
13.4%

Administrative expenses

$679,987.98 recorded amount
18.0%
Fundraising efficiency
$0.33 spent per $1 raised in donations, as defined in the source.

Expense shares are displayed as percentages. Component amounts in this collection match total expenses multiplied by the source ratios; rounding can leave a small difference from the total. The source does not supply a row-specific fiscal year. Field definitions ↗

Historical leadership record

The leadership information supplied

Recorded leader
Elizabeth Smokowski
Recorded compensation
$107,533.00
Recorded compensation percentage
2.84%

These fields do not establish the current officeholder or current compensation. The metadata does not specify the denominator of the leader compensation percentage. Read with context ↗

Inspect all 23 original source fields

Exact source strings are retained below, including numeric precision. A blank value is marked as not reported; zero remains zero.

All 23 original fields for Longmont Humane Society
Source fieldOriginal source value
ascore
Accountability & transparency score
100.0
category
Category
Animals
description
Mission & description
In 1972, the Longmont Branch of the Boulder County Humane Society officially became the Longmont Humane Society. The Longmont Humane Society is an open admission facility with a mission of: Caring, serving and educating to improve the lives of companion animals. LHS provides temporary shelter to thousands of animals every year: dogs, cats, small mammals, and birds who are lost, abandoned, or surrendered. Loving attention, nutritious food, meticulous health care and daily exercise are standard parts of the high-quality care provided to each animal.
ein
EIN
84-0645455
tot_exp
Total expenses
3777711.0
admin_exp_p
Administrative expense fraction
0.18
fund_eff
Fundraising efficiency ($ per $1 raised)
0.33
fund_exp_p
Fundraising expense fraction
0.134
program_exp_p
Program expense fraction
0.684
fscore
Financial score
76.23
leader
Recorded leader
Elizabeth Smokowski
leader_comp
Recorded leader compensation
107533.0
leader_comp_p
Recorded leader compensation fraction
0.028399999999999998
motto
Tagline
Caring, serving and educating to improve the lives of companion animals.
name
Charity name
Longmont Humane Society
tot_rev
Total revenue
3751406.0
score
Overall score
83.19
state
State code
CO
subcategory
Subcategory
Animal Rights, Welfare, and Services
size
Source size label
mid
program_exp
Program expenses
2583954.324
fund_exp
Fundraising expenses
506213.27400000003
admin_exp
Administrative expenses
679987.98

Source: Charity Navigator Scores Expenses Dataset, version 1, attributed to katyjqian on Kaggle. Collection: May 2019; rating details mostly from 2017. Read attribution, scope, and reuse notes.